Rory Said
← All themes

Herd behaviour and social proof

Copying others is usually a better bet than reasoning alone, until it isn't.

Conventional thinking

People weigh the options and choose what's individually best for them.

Rory’s inversion

People mostly do what everyone else is doing. Copying, not calculating, drives most behaviour.

Sutherland treats habit and social copying as the two dominant forces in human behaviour, well ahead of the stable, individually reasoned preferences that economics assumes: doing what everyone else does is rarely optimal but is reliably safe, which is exactly why it's so persistent.

He grounds this in evolutionary and experimental material: a physical shop full of other shoppers normalises the act of shopping, primates who feel cheated only once they see another primate getting a better deal, and a first mover into any new behaviour taking a disproportionate reputational hit for it. He's also alert to tipping points, the moment ordering a Guinness, buying an electric car, or owning a mobile phone stops requiring justification and simply becomes the default, and to the darker version of the same mechanism, where "purity spirals" and enforced conformity punish good faith dissent regardless of whether the dissenting view happens to be correct.

The Counterpoint

An account this thoroughgoing struggles to distinguish herd behaviour that is genuinely smart, aggregated social information from herd behaviour that is simply collective error. Sutherland's own examples of 'good' norms and 'bad' ones rely on him, not the theory, to tell them apart.

147 verified insights in this theme

147 verified insights in this theme